<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What is the efficiency of refining petroleum?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://askalandman.com/what-is-the-efficiency-of-refining-petroleum.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://askalandman.com/what-is-the-efficiency-of-refining-petroleum.htm</link>
	<description>Questions and Answers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:02:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gary H</title>
		<link>http://askalandman.com/what-is-the-efficiency-of-refining-petroleum.htm/comment-page-1#comment-2716</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 09:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://askalandman.com/what-is-the-efficiency-of-refining-petroleum.htm#comment-2716</guid>
		<description>In answering a previous question on automobile efficiency, I posted the following:

[REPOST] The following lists efficiencies of both potential sources of energy in terms of converting to a form that a vehicle can use (&quot;well to tank efficiency&quot;) and various types of vehicle propulsion systems possible (&quot;tank to wheel efficiency&quot;). &quot;Tank to wheel&quot; efficiency of common current vehicles is listed as being 22%. However, the well to tank efficiency for same is 88%. 22% of 88% equals a total efficiency of 19%.

http://www.memagazine.org/mepower03/gauging/gauging.html


This is a very interesting page. For example, all-electric vehicles are capable of running at 44% efficiency (this is almost the most efficient form of propulsion, a hybird Fisher-Tropsch diesel is the highest at 45%), but unfortunately, production of the electrical energy required to charge electric vehicles is only 48%, yielding total efficiency of 21% - though still slightly better than current vehicles, it&#039;s much less than I was aware of.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In answering a previous question on automobile efficiency, I posted the following:</p>
<p>[REPOST] The following lists efficiencies of both potential sources of energy in terms of converting to a form that a vehicle can use (&quot;well to tank efficiency&quot;) and various types of vehicle propulsion systems possible (&quot;tank to wheel efficiency&quot;). &quot;Tank to wheel&quot; efficiency of common current vehicles is listed as being 22%. However, the well to tank efficiency for same is 88%. 22% of 88% equals a total efficiency of 19%.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.memagazine.org/mepower03/gauging/gauging.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.memagazine.org/mepower03/gauging/gauging.html</a></p>
<p>This is a very interesting page. For example, all-electric vehicles are capable of running at 44% efficiency (this is almost the most efficient form of propulsion, a hybird Fisher-Tropsch diesel is the highest at 45%), but unfortunately, production of the electrical energy required to charge electric vehicles is only 48%, yielding total efficiency of 21% &#8211; though still slightly better than current vehicles, it&#8217;s much less than I was aware of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

